Switch headers Switch to TIGweb.org

Are you an TIG Member?
Click here to switch to TIGweb.org

HomeHomeExpress YourselfPanoramaYouth Participation - Time for Action
a TakingITGlobal online publication

(Advanced Search)

Panorama Home
Issue Archive
Current Issue
Next Issue
Featured Writer
TIG Magazine
Short Story
My Content
Youth Participation - Time for Action Printable Version PRINTABLE VERSION
by Piyoo Kochar, United States Sep 21, 2004
Child & Youth Rights   Opinions
 1 2   Next page »


Youth Participation - Time for Action Participation has entered the mainstream vocabulary of development, and inclusion is following hard on its heels. Though practice has lagged behind rhetoric, more and more social groups have been identified as marginal or excluded, and their participation and inclusion is seen as priorities. So it has been with women, ethnic and religious minorities, refugees, and the very old.

Youth have been seen as a very different sort of category. Being at the ‘transition’ phase, youth are often seen as ‘people finding their ground,’ or ‘learning the ropes from the elders,’ and not as full, operational members of society. They are in a psychosocial moratorium, in the waiting room of society. They do not know everything yet, and can not do everything yet. In this deficiency model, young people are not always taken seriously. The concept of participation then becomes relevant; embedded in the theme of transition is a link between participation and gaining acceptance as citizen in all its dimensions.

The concept of participation has evolved from concerns of beneficiaries to concerns about forms of engagement by citizens in policy formulation and decision-making in areas that affect their lives. Participation is associated with citizenship. Citizens engage with government, not as passive recipients but as proactive consumers. As consumers, citizens ensure that government is held accountable, is responsive to their needs, and is a partner in development.

Legitimizing youth participation raises challenges for people who try to change the web of power relationships between adults, youths and institutions. These power dynamics influence youth capacity for participation through roles and relationships. Adults influence youth as facilitators and parents, and youth influence each other through peer relationships. The degree of youth’s ‘real power’ (Woollcombe, 1996) is one determinant in the type of genuine participation which could be achieved. Adults set a limit on youth capacity for involvement, providing support, or reinforcement to projects. This is particularly true for girls in developing nations. Intergenerational difference is exacerbated by the perceived ‘empowerment’ of youth.

Youth are as diverse as adults in their characteristics, talents, interests and passions. Their sub cultural norms can influence how adult initiated participatory projects are perceived and implemented by young people. For youth to exercise their rights and realize their citizenship, they need ‘real power’ (Woollcombe, 1996) to negotiate and work in partnership with adults and working through decisions and taking responsibility for actions and learning from outcomes.

Although youth participation is recognized as an ideal, there has been little serious investigation of the process of direct youth involvement in decision-making, and little critical examination of the impact of such involvement (Calvert, Zeldin & Weisenbach, 2002). Questions such as: "Are youth truly empowered?" "Do they want to be?" and, dare I say, "Are they capable?" have not been seriously investigated in the past. While many young people feel disenfranchised from the processes of power and their ability to make a difference, they still care deeply about issues relevant to them, such as education, employment, the environment, health, and sexuality (Hallett, 1999). Genuine participation in decision-making should deal with issues of most concern to them.

The society needs to start from the belief in the possibilities of young people to actually actively participate in society or specific parts of it. The attention should go out to the positive qualities and the potential of the youth. Such a basic principle or approach is called a competence approach. Young people need to be involved in the contextual factors which will best promote their capacity for participation. Degrees of participation should be evaluated from a perspective of whether the youth have benefited from the process and whether they have enjoyed it. It may be that youth actually engage in more genuine participatory roles through informal contexts. As the informal settings may provide more opportunity to communicate in their own language, develop competency in working with their peers and negotiating with the adults, and knowing that their activities are valued by the adults.

Young people cannot be both change agents in an anti-structural sense, and partners with the status quo (adults) at the same time. They may use existing structures as a way forward, but they also struggle against those structures in their search for satisfactory solutions to the issues they see as important.

Therefore, it is essential to create opportunities to share information with and involve young people, acknowledge youth leadership, and encourage responsibility. Young people should be active participants in their development, and not passive recipients of services. This includes the need for creation of an environment that supports the continued life-long development of young men and women’s skills and capacities, their involvement in democratic processes, and in nation-building initiatives.

 1 2   Next page »   


You must be logged in to add tags.

Writer Profile
Piyoo Kochar

This user has not written anything in his panorama profile yet.

Ricky | Oct 8th, 2004
I agree with you, young people are here to participate but aren't always looked at as the right ones for the job.

youth participation
kshitij joshi | Nov 1st, 2004
as you rightly conclude it is indeed a challenge for institutions to accomodate youth involvement,in my limited experience as an unheard youth i think direct action /involvement of youth in thier relative concerns is the need of the day ,the courage exists but is not apparent,break loose of conventional wisdom and put forward your participation this ,in my belief, is the only tried and tested way to discover dynamics in any processes or relationships. JUST DO IT is indeed a powerful motto,as my guru says the brave may live only a few moments the cautious don,t live at all

I agree
Antony Felix O. O. Simbowo | Jan 3rd, 2005
The youth are the only symbol of revolution in the world. We have the capability to spur change. That is a fact.

thanks for your comments everyone
Piyoo Kochar | Feb 27th, 2008
.. i really appreciate that! I was wondering if you think that with increasing access to technology as a possible way for young people to 'just do it', is there any significant improvement in their involvement/inclusion? I would be happy to hear what you all have to say :) Again, thanks for reading and commenting!

You must be a TakingITGlobal member to post a comment. Sign up for free or login.