<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
            <rss version="2.0" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss">
                <channel>
                    <title>TIGblogs - David Sontag's TIGBlog</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/</link> 
                    <description>What's on the minds of young leaders from around the globe?</description> 
                    <language>en-us</language> 
             
                <item> 
                    <title>N. Korea Reports 1st Nuclear Arms Test</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/50689</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[So, it appears like North Korea finally did it: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/09/world/asia/09korea.html">N. Korea Reports 1st Nuclear Arms Test - New York Times</a>. Seems like a good time to post an analysis I wrote two years ago on the subject: <a href="http://people.csail.mit.edu/dsontag/writings/northkorea.pdf">Six-party negotiations on North Korea's nuclear ambitions</a>.]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 12:09:00 EDT</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/50689</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title>Frustrated with apathy!</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/24401</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[This last Thursday some friends and I (part of a newly formed student organization called C.A.R.E: Children's Aid  Relief Enterprise) ran a benefit concert, raising money for UNICEF's tsunami relief fund. It was a fantastic concert, really the best one of the year. We brought together the top campus singing and dance groups, in addition to some less-known individuals (who were very talented). However, in the end what resulted is that there were fewer people in the audience than performers! Of course, some of this may have to do with bad publicity. However, I myself advertised at the International House (a big dorm in Berkeley with >500 residents from all around the world) for over a week before the concert. I posted flyers, I handed out notices, I told people about it repeatedly. Not one person from the I-House came to see the performance (although 3 persons donated money)! What's up with that? Sure, some of the people felt that their studying was more important. Sure, some people had prior committments. But, overall, what it boils down to is that this kind of effort ranks low on people's priority list. We were asking for $5 to $7 for an amazing perfomance (I was so thrilled with it that I gave $25), with a superb speaker who had just come back from Sri Lanka, and all the money was going to help children. Shouldn't people be falling all over themselves to come to such events??]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2005 03:36:00 EDT</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/24401</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title>Words with Leon Fuerth</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/167563</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[Tonight I attended a panel discussion, at the International House (where I'm currently living) in Berkeley, titled "Foreign Policy in a New Global Era". Various experts on US foreign policy were present, and the discussion was lively and interesting. All of the panelists seemed to be in agreement that in some number of years (20?) the US will no longer be the world's only great power. Much of the discussion was focused on China, which showing significant strength both economically and politically. One interesting comment was that political influence and "public face" is zero-sum, and that the US's loss of influence in world affairs -- caused by the Iraq war and bad foreign policy -- is being taken by China, which -- especially with regards to North Korea -- has been gaining prominence and strength in Asia (and around the world).<br />
<br/><br />
<br/>One of the panelists was Leon Fuerth, former National Security Advisor to Vice-President Gore. After the event finished, I managed to grab his attention for a couple of minutes, and I asked him for his opinion of how future US administrations should proceed with regards to the Kyoto Protocol. He responded that it doesn't make sense to consider future administrations, because by the time President Bush leaves office, the foundations of that agreement will be non-existent. I had remembered reading in one of my books on diplomacy that, at the time of Gore's departure to Japan for the last-minute attempt to save the Kyoto talks, no one expected the US Senate to ratify an agreement. I asked Fuerth about why Gore went, if he had known that there was no chance of Senate ratification. Fuerth responded (a bit indignantly) that he had been on Air Force Two with Gore, as they went to Japan, and that Gore did *not* know that the Senate wouldn't ratify. Furthermore, he said, something is better than nothing, and Gore wanted to keep the negotiations going (and look at the result: the US didn't ratify, but the Protocol is now in effect).<br />
<br/><br />
<br/>Overall, an interesting night. I definitely need to study more international relations (and history). I am, however, currently taking a seminar called "Issues in U.S. Foreign Policy."]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2005 04:02:00 EST</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/167563</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title>Ukrainian youth movement</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/167565</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[So who's been to Freedom Square in the Ukraine recently? A <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/28/international/europe/28ukraine.html?oref=login">New York Times</a> article today talked about the leadership provided by youth in the current Ukraine political crisis. I'm amazed to see that the Yushchenko supporters are so well organized. You can find up to the minute updates at one of the organizer's sites, <a href="http://pora.org.ua/en/index.php?option=contenttask=blogcategoryamp;amp;id=75Itemid=86amp;page=2">PORA</a>. Can someone give a ring to <a href="http://pora.org.ua/en/index2.php?option=contenttask=viewamp;id=523pop=1amp;page=0">Mariana Savytska</a> and interview her for TakingITGlobal?]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2004 01:11:00 EST</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/167565</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title>Tell Congress to Investigate the 2004 Election</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/20560</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[I don't have any hope that John Kerry would win the election if there were a vote re-count. However, given the election difficulties of four years ago, and the introduction of new voting technology, I feel that it is important for an in-depth investigation to take place, immediately, and resolve the issues raised about miscounted votes.<br />
<br />
(This is for my American friends)<br />
<br />
Dear friend,<br />
<br />
Questions are swirling around whether the election was conducted honestly or not. We need to know -- was it or wasn't it?<br />
<br />
If people were wrongly prevented from voting, or if legitimate votes were mis-counted or not counted at all, we need to know so the wrongdoers can be held accountable, and to help prevent this from happening again.<br />
<br />
Members of Congress are demanding an investigation to answer this question. Join me in supporting their call, at:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.moveon.org/investigatethevote/">http://www.moveon.org/investigatethevote/</a><br />
<br />
Thanks!]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:40:00 EST</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/20560</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title>Iran Jails More Journalists and Blocks Web Sites</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/20483</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[Today I read the following New York Times's article: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/08/international/middleeast/08iran.html?th">Iran Jails More Journalists and Blocks Web Sites</a>. I've been concerned about this issue for a few years now, in regards to China's similar actions. I think that there is a technical solution here. What we need to do is to set up a global distributed network of secure proxies, both within and outside of Iran/China. It'd work like this. Let's say that person A is within Iran/China, and B is a computer outside of Iran. When person A wants to see a web page (let's say of Amnesty International, which would surely be blocked), B would receive the web page and encrypt it, then send the encrypted version to A. Anyone listening to A's internet connection would be unable to see what web page this person is viewing. There are some important details here. First, the Chinese government could easily just block access to the proxies. Thus, we need a very large and dispersed network of proxies, which would make it impossible to block. Second, it is important that there be proxies *within* the country (China or Iran), storing cached versions of the data. This way, if the government decides to block all Internet access going outside of the country, some of the data will still be available. Third, individual users need to be instructed to turn off their browser's caching mechanism, so that it is more difficult for the government to see what they were looking at if they were to come knocking at their door. Fourth, this needs to be implemented simultaneously on tens of thousands of computers. The government would then have to choose between prosecuting everyone or letting the practice continue. Especially for China, which is becoming a global trade power, total enforcement would result in a significant blow to their economy, which would be a good deterrant.]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 07:00:00 EST</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/20483</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title>Iran Jails More Journalists and Blocks Web Sites</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/167567</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[Today I read the following New York Times's article: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/08/international/middleeast/08iran.html?th">Iran Jails More Journalists and Blocks Web Sites</a>. I've been concerned about this issue for a few years now, in regards to China's similar actions. I think that there is a technical solution here. What we need to do is to set up a global distributed network of secure proxies, both within and outside of Iran/China. It'd work like this. Let's say that person A is within Iran/China, and B is a computer outside of Iran. When person A wants to see a web page (let's say of Amnesty International, which would surely be blocked), B would receive the web page and encrypt it, then send the encrypted version to A. Anyone listening to A's internet connection would be unable to see what web page this person is viewing. There are some important details here. First, the Chinese government could easily just block access to the proxies. Thus, we need a very large and dispersed network of proxies, which would make it impossible to block. Second, it is important that there be proxies *within* the country (China or Iran), storing cached versions of the data. This way, if the government decides to block all Internet access going outside of the country, some of the data will still be available. Third, individual users need to be instructed to turn off their browser's caching mechanism, so that it is more difficult for the government to see what they were looking at if they were to come knocking at their door. Fourth, this needs to be implemented simultaneously on tens of thousands of computers. The government would then have to choose between prosecuting everyone or letting the practice continue. Especially for China, which is becoming a global trade power, total enforcement would result in a significant blow to their economy, which would be a good deterrant.]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 04:11:00 EST</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/167567</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title>Kyoto Protocol - The Climate is Changing Now What?</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/20453</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[I've been reading about the Kyoto Protocol on global warming recently. A class I'm taking, Diplomacy  International Negotiation, has looked a bit into the negotiations surrounding the Kyoto Protocol. Some significant and relatively new aspects of the negotiations: the involvement of and pressure from non-governmental organizations, a tight deadline for negotiations to be completed (which ended up being delayed one day), and the effect of public attention (significantly increased by Vice-President Gore's last-minite trip to save the negotiations from failing).<br />
<br /><br />
<br />Here is some background information: <a href="http://environment.about.com/od/kyotoprotocol/a/aa090402a.htm">Primer on the Kyoto Protocol - The Climate is Changing Now What?</a>, and the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_Protocol">Wikipedia listing</a>.<br />
<br /><br />
<br />Russia just finished ratifying the Protocol. The Protocol will become active 90 days after they submit the ratification to the United Nations. The United States has not ratified the protocol, and will not be subject to its . Gore came to my University last month, and stressed that global warming is the single most important issue facing the world today. So why hasn't the US signed? My first thought would have been to blame it on the Bush administration, but a bit more reading seems to show that the Senate has been the real blocker (President Clinton never submitted the treaty for ratification). President Bush said of the treaty:<br />
<br /><blockquote>"<em>The world's second-largest emitter of greenhouse gases is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China" title="China">China</a>. Yet, China was entirely exempted from the requirements of the Kyoto Protocol. This is a challenge that requires a 100 percent effort; ours, and the rest of the world's. America's unwillingness to embrace a flawed treaty should not be read by our friends and allies as any abdication of responsibility. To the contrary, my administration is committed to a leadership role on the issue of climate change. Our approach must be consistent with the long-term goal of stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere."</em></blockquote> The issue is important, and the US does need to act to "save the environment." However, I'm not sure whether the United States <span style="font-style: italic;">should</span> ratify the agreement. The Senate wants binding targets and timetables for developing countries as well as industrialized countries. Differential treatment for developing countries may indeed be necessary. Still, China and many of the other developing countries are advancing very rapidly. If and when they become economic superpowers, should they not be subject to the same emissions quotas as today's industrialized nations? By choosing not to sign a possibly ineffective treaty, the US keeps its bargaining chips, leaving the door open for future negotiations.<br />
<br />  <br /><br />--<br><font color="gray" size="2">Posted by David to <a href="http://cyberiahybrid.blogspot.com/2004/11/kyoto-protocol-climate-is-changing-now_06.html">David's commentary</a> at 11/6/2004 03:09:55 AM</font>]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 06:39:00 EST</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/20453</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title>Kyoto Protocol - The Climate is Changing Now What?</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/167569</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[I've been reading about the Kyoto Protocol on global warming recently. A class I'm taking, Diplomacy  International Negotiation, has looked a bit into the negotiations surrounding the Kyoto Protocol. Some significant and relatively new aspects of the negotiations: the involvement of and pressure from non-governmental organizations, a tight deadline for negotiations to be completed (which ended up being delayed one day), and the effect of public attention (significantly increased by Vice-President Gore's last-minite trip to save the negotiations from failing).<br /><br /><br /><br />Here is some background information: <a href="http://environment.about.com/od/kyotoprotocol/a/aa090402a.htm">Primer on the Kyoto Protocol - The Climate is Changing Now What?</a>, and the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_Protocol">Wikipedia listing</a>.<br /><br /><br /><br />Russia just finished ratifying the Protocol. The Protocol will become active 90 days after they submit the ratification to the United Nations. The United States has not ratified the protocol, and will not be subject to its . Gore came to my University last month, and stressed that global warming is the single most important issue facing the world today. So why hasn't the US signed? My first thought would have been to blame it on the Bush administration, but a bit more reading seems to show that the Senate has been the real blocker (President Clinton never submitted the treaty for ratification). President Bush said of the treaty:<br /><br /><blockquote>"<em>The world's second-largest emitter of greenhouse gases is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China" title="China">China</a>. Yet, China was entirely exempted from the requirements of the Kyoto Protocol. This is a challenge that requires a 100 percent effort; ours, and the rest of the world's. America's unwillingness to embrace a flawed treaty should not be read by our friends and allies as any abdication of responsibility. To the contrary, my administration is committed to a leadership role on the issue of climate change. Our approach must be consistent with the long-term goal of stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere."</em></blockquote> The issue is important, and the US does need to act to "save the environment." However, I'm not sure whether the United States <span>should</span> ratify the agreement. The Senate wants binding targets and timetables for developing countries as well as industrialized countries. Differential treatment for developing countries may indeed be necessary. Still, China and many of the other developing countries are advancing very rapidly. If and when they become economic superpowers, should they not be subject to the same emissions quotas as today's industrialized nations? By choosing not to sign a possibly ineffective treaty, the US keeps its bargaining chips, leaving the door open for future negotiations.<br /><br />]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 06:11:00 EST</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/167569</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title>Democracy is a lot of work</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/20339</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[I finally finished (my absentee) voting for the 2004 elections. Deciding the Presidential race took no extra effort, though I did watch 3 of the 4 debates. However, I am a resident of Berkeley, California, and there were 32 state, district, school, and city measures to vote on, in addition to a few other appointments that needed to be decided. Especially because I'm quite young, deciding my view on each of these measures took me hours of work -- reading the unbiased legal commentary, the arguments for, against, and rebuttals of these. I spent over 8 hours on the task, and still I wish I could have spent more time. Annoyingly, only 1/2 of the information I needed to vote on the measures was available in my voter pamphlet (which was already over 1/3 inch thick). I needed to go online to read about the state measures and candidates. Is democracy supposed to be so time consuming? Aren't I supposed to elect representatives to decide on most of these measures for me? Does everyone spend the equivalent of one work day trying to figure out where to place their vote? Will I always spend so much time voting, or will laziness (or wisdom) prevail?]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/20339</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title></title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/167571</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/03/international/middleeast/03tube.html?th=amp;oref=loginpagewanted=printamp;position=">The New York Times > International > Middle East > How the White House Embraced Disputed Arms Intelligence</a><br /><br /><br /><br />In this article, they quote a front page New York Times article, from two years ago, that gave "the first detailed account of the alumnimum tubes," yet "gave no hint of a debate over the tubes." Why doesn't this article say anything about <em>why</em> the New York Times article refrained from discussing the debate? I'd like to know, for example, whether the New York Times had spoken to their contacts in the Energy Department, and knew about the debate, or whether they were completely relying on the White House and CIA's skewed intelligence reports.]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2004 07:10:00 EDT</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/167571</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title>The New York Times gt; International gt; Middle East gt;...</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/183741</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/03/international/middleeast/03tube.html?th=amp;oref=loginpagewanted=printamp;position=">The New York Times > International > Middle East > How the White House Embraced Disputed Arms Intelligence</a><br /><br /><br /><br />In this article, they quote a front page New York Times article, from two years ago, that gave "the first detailed account of the alumnimum tubes," yet "gave no hint of a debate over the tubes." Why doesn't this article say anything about <em>why</em> the New York Times article refrained from discussing the debate? I'd like to know, for example, whether the New York Times had spoken to their contacts in the Energy Department, and knew about the debate, or whether they were completely relying on the White House and CIA's skewed intelligence reports.]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2004 07:10:00 EDT</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/183741</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title>I spent the last couple of hours beginning to read...</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/183743</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[I spent the last couple of hours beginning to read the <a href="http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf">9/11 Commission Report</a>. While it is very sad reading, it is also extremely interesting, and I encourage everyone to take a look. I've so far read the first 50 pages, which review the circumstances surrounding the four plane hijackings, and all communication between the planes, ground control, and the military. Later in the report, historical information on Bin Ladin and terrorism in the USA is discussed. Everything is very well written.<br /><br /><br /><br />One of the key applications of my current research on identity uncertainty is airplane tracking, and this report really highlights the deficiencies of the current radar tracking systems. In situations where an airplane's transponder is shut off (such as occurred during the highjackings), it is still possible to use radar beams to determine the approximate location (but not elevation) of these planes. However, there doesn't seem to be any integration between the two systems, and the airtraffic controllers must manually switch between the two systems. Without the transponders, how can you determine which blips correspond to which airplanes, and which blips correspond to the same airplane over the time it is being tracked? My research hopes to solve these problems, and having read this report, I have a much better understanding of its applicability - and it's urgency.]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 01:09:00 EDT</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/183743</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title>The face of global AIDS

This was a very well-wr...</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/183745</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/viewpoints/articles/0926ingley0926.html">The face of global AIDS</a><br /><br /><br /><br />This was a very well-written article on a very important subject. In the past I've wondered what the correct strategy to fight AIDS should be: providing funds for antiviral medicine research, vaccine research, or using all funds to promote prevention of the spread of the disease. This article made me realize, for a second time, the importance of stopping the circle of death. By keeping mothers with HIV alive and healthy longer, perhaps they will be able to influence (and care for) their children enough to prevent their children from falling into the same trap they had.]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2004 08:09:00 EDT</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/183745</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title>I just tried out eMusic.com. A word of warning for...</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/183747</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[I just tried out <a href="http://www.emusic.com/">eMusic.com</a>. A word of warning for future users: it doesn't have a large selection of popular music. I searched for Avril Lavigne and for Black Eyed Peas, and it had neither. I didn't lose much though, as it was a free trial.]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2004 04:09:00 EDT</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/183747</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title>The streets of Berkeley</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/18605</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[My friend Jonathan Gray and I went on a mission tonight. We ventured to Telegreph Avenue, the well known street in Berkeley, California, where you find yummy food stores, tons of shopping, and of course, hippies, pot smokers, drunkards, and many homeless. Our goal was to capture the "street life" of Berkeley, to enter in last month's Global Gallery competition... which we missed by about a week. We brought our digital cameras, pockets full of change, and an open mind.<br />
<br />
We were at first pretty shy, and we just asked a couple of interesting looking kids on the street if we could take a picture of them. We said that we were doing a chronicle of Berkeley street life. They were wearing black, gothic looking clothes, with cut pants and a nose ring... they had their packs with them and were clearly living on the street. Later on, when we walked a block to take a picture two girls sitting on the street, with a sign saying "Out of work Pornstars," the guys came back and we chatted for a bit. They were from North Carolina and had just been traveling around for a while, and ended up in Berkeley. I asked them where they sleep, and they said in shrubs and other locations where the police don't bug them. Not staying much longer, we moved on and walked down the street until we reached a group of 3 people. One black man who was in his mid 30's, very well dressed, and clearly very intelligent, another younger guy, who was stoned and didn't speak much, and an older hispanic guy who was quite drunk and spent 20 minutes trying to tell me his life's philosophy (but not very successfully), and trying to tell me where he grew up in NYC and New Jersey. These guys definitely didn't want their picture taken, but they were interesting to talk to. They didn't accept our change, making a joke of it by passing it around among themselves until it reached back to us... they said that there were more needy people. The drunk dude told me that he was only half-homeless, that he has an uncle whose place he can go to. And the guy who was well dressed has had a job in the area, and he seemed to just around to smoke some pot. We spoke politics for a while, specifically about illegal immigrants coming from Mexico, and whether their children should have education provided by the state. The general consensus was yes, because they are working and contributing to the US economy. It took a while to peel away from these guys, because the drunk dude kept on trying to put his arm around my shoulder and talk nonsense to me.<br />
<br />
We continued walking down the street until we met a young (I would guess mid 20's) kid named Justin, who was dressed in some interesting clothes, and was happy to allow us to take pictures of him. Justin has been living in Berkeley for six weeks now. He is from Mississippi, and chose to come to the city of Berkeley because of the University and the intellectual atmosphere. We chatted for over an hour, about a range of topics: from how to feed the world's population with 250 greenhouses to the five basic needs of humans (according to him, health, food, shelter, communications, and transportation). He's held a variety of jobs - web designer, graphics designer, dish washer, and 6 others. Apparently his decision to come to Berkeley and live on the streets was part of a desire to "rough it out," envisioned during an episode with Mushrooms (drugs). He was an extremely intelligent person... We learned a lot from him about street life in Berkeley. He said that he sleeps with two other people, most nights in shelters at local churches. He said that *no one* in Berkeley, unless they're very dumb, goes hungry. A homeless person could be hiding in the most remote location, and some local Berkeley resident will find him to give him food and/or money. Everyone on the streets seemed to know each other's names. They have a strong sense of camraderie. While I was talking to Justin, another (much more disheveled looking) homeless guy walks up and hands 3 small (new) tubes of toothpaste to Justin. He doesn't ask for anything in return. Then he says that he'll be back in 15 minutes, and returns carrying a blanket, sweater, and a very old-looking Indian shirt (corta). The sweater ended up getting passed on to another guy sitting on a skateboard next to Justin. I was astounded to see so much sharing! Justin told me that Berkeley shop owners, knowing that their trash cans are sifted through, leave items that are good either towards the top of the trash, or right next to it.<br />
<br />
I learned so much. For example, these guys are perfectly welcome on the streets, so long as they stand to the side (there is actually a clear separation between the sidewalk and the location where they are allowed to loiter). However, they're not supposed to lie down, and he was telling us about a nearby shop owner who has recently been calling the cops because of one guy who, far away, was innocently resting his legs. Apparently these homeless guys keep a good repetoire with the Berkeley police. They want to keep the streets safe just as much as the police do, and they do what they can to keep them safe. Most of these guys smoke pot and do some other drugs, but the Berkeley police don't seem to really care. I mean, in past times I've seen homeless people with signs saying "please give me money to feed my pot addiction". Safety is a bit of a concern though, and Justin had slept his first couple weeks with a weapon in his hand. He said it is safer because he has two other persons that he regularly sleeps with at night.<br />
<br />
Ok, that's all for tonight. I'm waiting for Jonathan to write up his observations; maybe I'll edit mine later. I walked home around 12am at night, but then since it was such a nice night I decided to go walking through campus... so until about 1am I was strolling through the Berkeley campus by myself (it is pretty safe, there are cops driving by very frequently), taking pictures and reading a book.]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2004 05:10:00 EDT</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/18605</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title>Fahrenheit 9/11</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/18016</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[I just came back from seeing Michael Moore's latest film, a documentary about President Bush's involvement (or lack thereof) in events surrounding 9/11, the war in Afghanistan, and the war in Iraq. I rate the film 6/10 on a IMDB scale. While the film certainly did solidify my resolve to get Bush out of office, I found myself annoyed at many of Moore's attacks. For example, he presumptuously tried to guess at Bush's thoughts when Bush, sitting in a classroom with children, was first told of the 9/11 attacks. I also felt that I didn't get enough information and context for many of the connections made between wrong doing and Bush, though I don't doubt the validity of Moore's research. Some of the interviews were uncomfortably long, and should have been edited better. The organization, for lack of a better word, of the documentary was fantastic. When describing the 9/11 attacks, he left the screen completely black for a few seconds while the sounds of destruction and terror, that we're all familiar with, filled the theatre's void. This was a very interesting effect, allowing for us to use our much more powerful imagination. I found these few seconds emotionally unbearable. Overall a good movie, worth the trip to see. I still can't figure out why it is rated R.]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:39:00 EDT</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/18016</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title>United Press International: Senate: Iraq intellige...</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/183749</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20040709-050626-3922r">United Press International: Senate: Iraq intelligence was faulty</a><br /><br /><br /><br />I remember walking along the beach in Santa Barbara with my dad, talking about how much of a threat Iraq was - before the war. I claimed that I hadn't heard enough evidence to warrent war, and he thought that the risk of WMD was sufficient. I wish that my senators had asked more questions, done more research!]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2004 05:07:00 EDT</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/183749</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title>How long till everyone is a TIG'er?</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/16576</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[So I'm looking on craigslist.org for a summer sublet and I see a TIG e-mail address on one of the postings. I think to myself: "Cool!! I want to rent from that guy!" Turns out it was Jedi Mike, who I already know :) It's really cool knowing another person in Berkeley who is involved with TIG. Hopefully we get more Berkeley people on TIG soon.]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2004 05:05:00 EDT</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/16576</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title>Bridge to Baghdad</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/12105</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[I watched Bridge to Baghdad II yesterday (chattheplanet.com). It was a video of youth from NYC chatting with youth from Iraq over a live video link. I learned a lot and really enjoyed it. Great job Ben, et. al!!]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2003 02:27:00 EST</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/12105</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title>Google lt;-- Where I've been working!</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/183751</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.google.com/">Google</a> <-- Where I've been working!]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2003 12:08:00 EDT</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/183751</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title>I'm in NJ now. Need to spend the first week finish...</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/183753</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[I'm in NJ now. Need to spend the first week finishing up on my summer Google work, then it's time to relax for *gasp* one whole week. I'll be back in California August 24th.]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2003 11:08:00 EDT</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/183753</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item> 
                <item> 
                    <title>I'm horrified</title> 
                    <link>http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/872</link> 
                    <description><![CDATA[My heart goes out to everyone in NYC, plus all connected to the tragedy that occured earlier today. I'm glad I decided to give blood a couple days ago... I hope it gets shipped to the east coast quickly. All my friends in the NYC area -- if you haven't yet got in contact with me, please do. I need to know you're alright.]]></description> 
					<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2001 19:43:00 EDT</pubDate> 
					<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dsontag.tigblog.org/post/872</guid>
					<georss:point>42.3750000 -71.1061111</georss:point><geo:Point><geo:lat>42.3750000</geo:lat><geo:long>-71.1061111</geo:long></geo:Point>
                </item>
</channel>
</rss>